#1 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2008, 12:45 AM
Experienced User: Healthy
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 116
Default Did you have a C-section? There's too many happening

A report out today shows that one in four births are a C-section. According to the [URL="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=616113"]National Post, [/URL] this is too high and increased not because of medical emergencies but because of elective C-sections. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada report's raised concerns and quite rightly so about something that was initially meant to done only when a natural birth was impossible or an emergency warranted it, not to try avoid lawsuits.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2008, 07:15 PM
Experienced User: Healthy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 122
Default

No I had two kids and had them both natural. Of course that was about thirty some years ago. Things are so different now. I think sometimes it is much less stress on the baby when you have a C- section. Maybe that is why they do it more often.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2008, 11:22 AM
Experienced User: Healthy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 185
Default

Although there may be less stress, I don't believe that a c-section is better for the baby. A baby was designed to be birthed.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2008, 06:31 PM
Experienced User: Healthy
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 116
Default

I did have one myself, but it was an emergency one and certainly not something I'd have scheduled in like a hairdressing appointment! I was quite disappointed actually because I wanted to deliver naturally but my body had other ideas. My sister also had one, and for her it was because the baby was too big for her tiny hips to allow a normal delivery.

Wish I had tiny hips LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 01:00 PM
Active User: Feeling Good
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 83
Default

It's crazy how many people simply choose to have one and for not medical reasons at all. I have a friend who scheduled a c-section so it didn't conflict with her work schedule. :S
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 03:22 PM
Experienced User: Healthy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 375
Default

As Riskey says, I had my babies about thirty years ago. With my son, my cervix wouldn't dilate past 3 or 4, and he was a chin presentation, so I had to have a c-section. In those days if you had one c-section, you had to have them all that way. It's foolish to take major surgery so lightly, but as said, the OBs are afraid of being sued now. I do believe that they are the specialty that is sued the most.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 09:31 AM
Experienced User: Healthy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serenity View Post
A report out today shows that one in four births are a C-section. According to the [URL="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=616113"]National Post, [/URL] this is too high and increased not because of medical emergencies but because of elective C-sections.
I agree that there are *way* too many C-sections being done. One in four??? Wasn't like that in the past and I don't agree with choosing that if it's not a necessary situation.

My daughter was born via natural birth and I'm very glad for that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0